JonBenet Ramsey - Part 2
Case Evidence
Considering the possibility of an intruder, the police looked for but saw no footprints around the house or outside its windows or in the frost coating of the balcony outside JonBenet's room. Photographic evidence and the early local news reports contradict the later claims that the weather and yard condition were insufficient for an intruder to leave footprints.
There were no signs of forced entry. The alarm system had not been activated.
​
A room on the opposite side of the basement from JonBenet's body had a wooden casement window with broken glass. John Ramsey indicated that previously he had broken that pane to break into the house. Detectives noted that window had a dusty sill and a large unbroken spiderweb in its upper left corner. (Officers had noted likewise throughout the house cobwebs and painted-closed and undisturbed dust and debris on window sills.) However, regarding the claim of an intruder, the city's police chief later wrote, "Most investigators do not believe there was a legitimate point of entry. It is unknown how an intruder may have gotten in. [Colorado Springs investigator]
I agree, no intruder. While a man could crawl through that window (tight fit) any intruder would've destroyed the large cobweb in that window and disturbed the substantial layer of dust on the windowsill.
I checked with an entymologist. The species of spider that made that web was not active during the winter. Which means that web was spun the previous summer.
​
Arndt says that the Ramseys did not spend those morning hours in each other's company. While typically, parents cling to one another when a child is injured or killed, Patsy stayed in the sunroom with friends and John stayed mostly in his den, and read his mail in the kitchen (and as he later admitted, snuck off to the basement at one point).
When asked that morning who might be responsible for the crime, John gave police the name of an employee; and Patsy gave the name of one of her housekeepers. Really.
Arndt says that 10 a.m., the ransom note deadline, passed unnoticed. She says that the Ramseys did not remark whatsoever regarding the fact that the kidnapper had not called. This was a full three hours before John Ramsey "discovered" his daughter's body.
​
Arndt says that she asked the Ramseys and their friends to examine the ransom note for clues, and that almost everyone offered ideas to her except Mr. Ramsey.
Linda Arndt, who by all appearances months later had a nervous breakdown over the case, says at the time that she was confused about why the Ramseys would not speak to her.
Arndt suggested Mr. Ramsey search the home. (Up to that moment, at 1 p.m., he hadn't even looked into each room in their house for his daughter.)
​
The only FBI agent on the scene that day, Ron Walker, has stated that, "Virtually every staged murder scene that I have seen, the perpetrator manipulates the arrival of friends or other family members, who are then put in a situation where they actually discover the body, or they are with the perpetrator as the body is discovered." So at this point John Ramsey grabbed his friend Fleet White by the arm and "made a beeline" for the basement door, there discovering JonBenét's body.
When they came upon the corpse in the basement, Ramsey ripped the duct tape from her mouth and picked up the 47 inch long, 45 pound body. The sticky side of the tape had a perfect imprint of the young girls lips, but no indication of a protruding tongue or any effort to dislodge the tape. Thus the tape was used as a prop in staging a scene to make it look like the girl was being abducted.
A cord was tied, far too loosely to restrain a living child, on the dead girl's wrists to stage an abduction scene. (Binding with cord was symbolic and tied to the Last Bulb on the Christmas tree ritual.)
The circuitous route to the basement wine cellar where the body was "found" would be very difficult to navigate by a stranger, especially at night, especially if the child had been struggling, and especially when the staircase light switch is not in an expected location on a wall, but above and behind someone entering the stairs. Patsy's mother Nedra Paugh repeated to the detectives what had become a theme from family, a former nanny, and friends. "You couldn't find the basement in that house if you didn't know where it was. You know it was down, but which door would you go through to find it? There's a lot of doors that look like a basement door in that house."
When Fleet White ran upstairs shouting for an ambulance, Priscilla White and Barbara Fernie left their friend on a couch and hurried toward the commotion but Patsy stayed where she was.
​
Arndt saw Mr. Ramsey carrying the body from the basement, JonBenet's unsupported arms extended above her head, and realized that rigor mortis had set in, and that she had been dead for some time. Arndt quotes the father as telling her just then, "It has to be an inside job."
Such rigor mortis sets in after about six to twelve hours. There was also the scent of decomposition.
​
Patsy said her daughter went to bed wearing a red turtleneck although that was found balled up in her bathroom and she was instead wearing what she had worn at the Christmas party, a white pullover. (Patsy for years dealt with severe bed-wetting and similar challenges with her daughter. Detectives took note of this while considering the change of clothes and the unanimous opinion of their pediatric panel that JonBenet suffered previous abuse.)
​
At 1:30 p.m. a detective overheard John Ramsey talking by phone to his pilot and arranging a trip to Atlanta that evening for himself, his wife and son. Det. Sgt. Larry Mason told him, "You can't leave."
​
Literally, within only a few hours of finding their daughter's dead body, the Ramseys began assembling their team of many lawyers and private investigators. John hired separate attorneys for himself and Patsy. They paid for lawyers for a number of other family members, and very early even hired a high-powered public relations expert. In the early days of the case the Boulder police unwisely treated the Ramseys like nothing other than victims. Yet apparently it never occured to John or to his very capable private investigators, who were hard at work by the day after the murder, to share anything, not even "a shred of their findings", with the police who were at work searching for whoever did this to JonBenet.
​
From the autopsy, the coroner Dr. John Meyer found evidence of sexual assault from the previous night: a small abrasion and small amounts of her own blood in both her underwear and vagina. Three medical experts consulting for the police say that the injuries were also consistent with prior sexual abuse. As the Denver Post reported, the Dec. 27 autopsy "found scraping and swelling of the child's vaginal area, as well as a series of scrapes on the back of her right shoulder, left lower back and left lower leg. Sheila Rappaport, a Denver prosecutor who tries individuals accused of sexually assaulting or killing small children, said such a pattern is indicative" of such assault.
(Because skull fractures often do not produce bleeding, the minimal blood from JonBenet's large fracture does not indicate whether she had first been strangled.) A black light helped reveal that her body had been wiped clean but that a residue of blood was left on her thighs. (Also, the paintbrush handle that was used as a ligature had a broken-off tip never found at the house.) "Cause of death of this six year old female is asphyxia by strangulation associated with craniocerebral trauma."
​
The strangulation came 45 minutes to two hours after the head strike, based on the swelling on the brain. While the head wound would have eventually killed her, the strangulation actually did kill her. The rest of the scene we believe was staged, including the vaginal trauma, to make it look like a kidnapping/assault gone bad."
​
John Ramsey says that he had carried a sleeping JonBenet from the car straight to her bed that night. The coroner found something in her stomach "which may represent fragment of pineapple." The party she attended that night had served no pineapple, but police found a bowl of pineapple on the Ramsey's dining room table, with only Patsy's fingerprints on the bowl and spoon.
The murderer draped one of JonBenet's blankets around her body. That blanket held a pubic hair not linked to any family member. Unidentifiable DNA material, not from a single intruder, but a "composite from multiple people", was on her underwear and beneath her fingernails. Also, DNA "on her long johns appear to come from JonBenet and at least two other people, not one".
An unidentifiable palm print of unknown age was on the wine cellar door. The panties on her body were too large for JonBenet and with her long johns, contained a stain with male DNA which could not be linked to any house member but which was later linked, in 2008, to DNA on the waistband of the long johns that she was also wearing. (It is true of course that even new clothing can come with DNA present, but new clothes don't come with DNA in stains, as with JonBenet's clothing.)
​
Upon viewing the body, Patsy exclaimed that she had never before seen the underwear on her daughter's corpse. Detectives later found out that Patsy had recently purchased that very pair of underwear at Bloomingdale's in New York for her 12-year-old niece, but that JonBenet begged to have it kept for her, so Patsy put it away to save it for her. Prior to the murder, even friends of the family knew of this underwear story. If Patsy did recognize the distinctive underwear, and was lying, then she was trying to point the police to the exculpatory evidence, which she knew had been planted. The underwear alone proves the case. (Recovery of such vital evidence occurred despite Boulder's untrustworthy and obstructionist district attorney running interference for the Ramseys, for example, by repeatedly denying search warrant applications and hindering investigators' standard efforts to obtain credit card and telephone records, etc.)
​
Officer Barry Harkopp interviewed next door neighbors and reported that Scott Gibbons saw strange lights and movements coming from the kitchen area around midnight; and neighbor Melody Stanton awoke her husband around midnight after hearing a scream, and he stated he heard "the sound of metal clashing against cement." The Ramseys say they heard none of this.
Police found a Ramsey family flashlight on the kitchen counter, which was not normally kept on that counter, but nearby.
​
On Dec. 27, 1996 Patsy Ramsey, being exhausted and lying down, reached up and touched the face of a friend, Pam Griffin, the woman who had made
JonBenet's pageant costumes. Griffin thought Patsy was delirious when she asked, "Couldn't you fix this for me?" as though a sewing machine could bring back her daughter. She then remembers Patsy saying, "We didn't mean for this to happen" and Griffin got the definite feeling that in her weakened condition, Patsy had revealed that she knew who the killer was.
Patsy's 911 Call
Patsy Ramsey called 911 at 5:52 a.m. on Dec. 26 telling police that her daughter was missing and that she had found a ransom note.
911 dispatchers can catch bullets with their teeth. You aren't going to put one over on them, they can recognize a rehearsed 911 call in a nanosecond. They develop radar for those kind of calls. I had three of my dispatcher friends listen to that call. All three agreed it sounded like a staged call that had been rehearsed.
​
Boulder's 911 operator Kim Archuletta says, "I just remember having that sunken feeling... The problem was, if you hear the frantic in her voice when she's speaking to me, where she couldn't even answer my questions, it immediately stopped... it sounded like she said 'Okay, we've called the police, now what?' And that disturbed me... To me, it seemed rehearsed…"
​
Patsy had thought she'd hung up the phone after she made that 911 call. She hadn't and that 911 operator was able to hear 2 additional voices talking in the background.
But first let's decode Patsy's 911 call:
There have been many theories about what Patsy said after she thought she'd hung up the phone including:
911 operator Kim Archuletta: "Okay, we've called the police, now what?"
Many feel she said "Help me, Jesus. Help me" followed by "What did you do?"
Then a male voice (John Ramsey?) saying "We're not talking to you"
Followed by a third indiscernable voice, likely male.
​
But speculation isn't evidence or proof. The following video was made by a gentleman who not only does audio and acoustics for a living but also teaches it. He has done an analysis and restoration of Patsy's 911 call in an attempt to catch what Patsy said after she thought she'd hung up the phone. He shows every step he took in doing this.
Best listened to with headphones.
If I'm to remain objective, I have to agree with this expert. That portion of the 911 call simply can't be enhanced enough to determine precisely what Patsy (or anyone else) said after Patsy thought she'd hung up the phone. We can't discern for certain that the 3rd voice was that of a child, Burke as many believe. Speculation isn't evidence. The most we can conclude is that Patsy wasn't alone and four 911 operators have concluded the call was rehearsed before it was made.
​
The terminology she uses in that call fit with what one would normally hear in a kidnapping call. It's obvious she's distanced herself from her daughter, never once using JonBenet's name in that call. When someone fakes a 911 call they'll get overly polite - as Patsy did with her numerous "Please! Please!" She says she doesn't know what the ransom note said.The ransom note instructed not to alert the police or anyone else or JonBenet would die. Yet the first thing she does is call 911.
The Ransom Note
Police experts analyzed handwriting samples from 73 persons in and around the case and only one person could not be ruled out. On March 5, 1997, John Ramsey and Burke were cleared as writers. The investigators believe Patsy wrote the note and on April 14, 1997, they request from her a fifth handwriting sample. An expert used by the FBI assessed for the Boulder PD that after the crime, only one person of those investigated made a conscious effort to change their handwriting. Compared to her previous writings, after she had received a copy of the ransom note, Patsy changed her handwriting habits including for example her distinctive way of writing the lowercase 'a'.
In addition to her special sign-off and indentation similarities found by detectives, an ABC 20/20 program presented some of over 200 similarities found, including surprising idiosyncrasies, between Patsy's handwriting, with those in the ransom note.
​
Boulder PD contacted Dale Yeager and Denise Knoke at Seraph, Inc in 1997. Seraph Inc is a security consulting firm with investigative professionals and former intelligence officers. They were asked to submit an analysis of the ransom note.
Their conclusion: “…you are investigating a child’s murder with ritualistic overtones. Strangulation and sexual assault are most commonly seen in sadomasochism between heterosexual and homosexual adults.”
​
With Cina Wong, the same handwriting expert interviewed by 20/20, Investigation Discovery produced this 2-minute ransom note analysis:
Regarding the ransom note, no fingerprints were found on it even though it was "read" by the Ramseys and moved by them, yet multiple fingerprints from Patsy were found on the pad the pages were taken from. Patsy said only that she didn't recall if she ever touched the note, ran upstairs with it, etc.
Two minutes of Patsy refusing to acknowledge recognizing her own handwriting on the photos of herself and JonBenet in her own family's photo album.
Much of the "ransom" note is inconceivable from the perspective of an intruder. For example, no kidnapper pays a compliment of “respect” to the business of the victim's family, as the JonBenet ransom note does to the Ramsey business. But the clue that breaks the case is the phrase, “I advise you to be rested.” No theory of an intruder can explain that phrase, nor much of the above evidence against the Ramseys. However, that key phrase explains the evidence, both the inculpatory and the apparently exculpatory. And it shouts that the parents killed their daughter and then worked to throw the police off the trail. Thus the ransom note is practically a confession.
​
Although it may seem too obvious even to point out, realize that unlike in the JonBenet Ramsey murder:
- a kidnapper doesn't write the ransom note in the house
- a kidnapper doesn't write that he respects his victim's business
- a kidnapper doesn't molest the victim in the house
- a kidnapper doesn't kill the victim in the house
- a kidnapper doesn't ask for money for a corpse
- a kidnapper doesn't hang out writing and rewriting a note
- a kidnapper doesn't leave the victim behind in the house
- a kidnapper doesn't forget to call to arrange to get the ransom money
- a kidnapper doesn't break in on Christmas risking family stay overs
- a kidnapper doesn't put oversized underwear found in the house on the victim
- a kidnapper doesn't bring someone to the crime (3rd person's DNA on a stain), and
- a kidnapper certainly doesn't do ALL of the above.
i agree with Dale Yeager and Denise Knoke: “…you are investigating a child’s murder with ritualistic overtones. Strangulation and sexual assault are most commonly seen in sadomasochism between heterosexual and homosexual adults.”
In nearly every single Illuminati homicide I've worked, death via throat trauma was involved and per their "Last Bulb On the Christmas Tree" ritual, the symbolism connected to that ritual was demonstrated with the cording used to bind JonBenet. And I can't overlook the Illuminati's use of tasers and the symbolism connected with where the victim is tased, as JonBenet was.
​The Ramseys have often resisted cooperating with the ongoing investigation, as for example, on Feb. 19, 1997 when they refused to allow police to interview John's oldest son, John Andrew. A known feud developed early on between the detectives and District Attorney Alex Hunter. Potentially, the FBI or Colorado's attorney general could have brought obstruction of justice charges against Boulder district attorney officials and perhaps even charged Hunter himself with being an accessory after the fact. The unlawful leaking of crucial evidence to the team of lawyers which John Ramsey began assembling within a few hours of the discovery of his daughter's corpse, and the constant blocking of the most routine investigative tools, such as a search warrant for credit card records, would be only the start of the evidence against them.
Accusations of conflict of interest suggested the reason for Hunter's frequent conflict with detectives and sheltering of the Ramseys. For example, on Jan. 16, 1998, the Ramseys refused a police request for a second interview, but on June 25th allowed Hunter's office to question them. (This was very possibly done to give the D.A. an excuse to not call them as witnesses before the grand jury, which would have been a much more serious questioning.)
​
Linda Wilcox, a housekeeper, described the Ramseys, upon finding a flood in their home, Patsy panicking, and John as controlled but "furious," so filled with "rage" that his eyes "almost changed color."
The Denver Post in a nuanced piece, about material reported in the tabloids, indicates nonetheless that another former "housekeeper Geraldine Vodicka... says Mrs. Ramsey was paranoid that her husband 'would be tempted by any pretty young girls he came in contact with.' Therefore, women hired for the household staff had to be 'heavier, older and less attractive' than Mrs. Ramsey..."
​
Whereas the pad and pen used to create the "ransom" note, and the 4.5 inch stick used in the ligature strangulation, from Patsy's paintrbrush, and its matching half, had all been found in the house, other items were never recovered. The duct tape roll and any remainder of the cord used were never found in the Ramsey mansion.
Likewise, a footprint one foot from the body made in concrete dust from a High-Tec brand boot could not be linked to any shoe in the house. In his well-reasoned theory of the case, Boulder detective Thomas argues that in the early morning hours Patsy left the house to dispose of these items. In my theory of the case, John Ramsey was the parent who left the house, leaving behind Patsy to
finish writing the "ransom" note, while he disposed of these items.
​
Either way, I need to mention that High-Tec boots are a brand typically worn by cops. However, every officer at the BPD had their boots examined to see if the tread matched that of the footprint found next to JonBenet's body and none of the BPD officers boots matched the footprint found at the Ramsey home.
​
Four fibers on the duct tape have been linked to the black and red jacket that Patsy wore the night before. (It took many months for detectives to get just some of clothes worn that night by the Ramseys. Consider also the single beaver hair, of all things, found at the crime scene that detectives long believed might be matched to the elusive fur boots Patsy had worn that night.) When Patsy greeted an officer at 5:55 a.m. she was wearing the same velvet black pants and jacket she had just worn to the previous evening's Christmas party and her make-up was still on and her hair was still done.
Patsy maintains that she dressed that morning prior to finding out that JonBenet was missing. Yet it took the police more than a year to get the clothing the Ramseys were wearing the night before, just as it took months to get their credit card bills and phone records. And Patsy did not change her outfit from one day to the next on two days of TV interviews, which the police interpreted as an effort to manipulate people into thinking that such was her common practice.
​
Lie detector exams, though not admissible in court, can help an investigation yet the Ramseys refused to submit to a law enforcement arranged polygraph. John took offense at being asked by Det. Steve Thomas to take such a test and stated that he thought he might fail because of his guilt at not protecting his daughter. They even refused to submit if the test were conducted by the FBI. Instead, they made a public fanfare of results after their private lawyers arranged their own examinations, the first of which was "inconclusive" and by their second private examination, they "passed".
​
For the record, I am against polygraph examinations. I don't care who administers them being more than familiar with how the Illuminati cabal has infiltrated agencies like the FBI and even local law enforcement agencies. They routinely "rig" so-called investigations as they did when they targeted me.
Polygraph tests are not reliable which is why they're not admissible in court!
​
Prosecutors often fail to convict parents who murder a child, because most people cannot even imagine committing such a crime. Sadly, however, Susan Smith drowned her two young boys, just as thousands of parents have murdered their own children, and countless fathers have molested their daughters. Such brutality does happen, and it is common within Illuminati families. Society’s mindset disregarding such behavior results in more victims.
​
Parents have often killed their children and motives include any or a combination of these: anger that becomes unpremeditated rage that gets "out of control"; blaming a child for the parents' behavior; aftermath of sexual abuse; mother's jealousy of daughter. JonBenet's actual murder and kidnap scheme came about to cover up an initial crime and I contend that crime had to do with an Illuminati ritual gone awry.
​
There was one discovery we made that convinced me we were dealing with an Illuminati cult related homicide. These Illuminists have a habit of "monumentalizing" their kills. We saw this with the CIA assassination of JFK and the subsequent erection of the monument in Dealy Plaza commemorating that assassination. (Just one example)
​
After John Ramsey left Colorado he purchased a new yacht. What did he name it?
The TenOClock - the time of death stated as JonBenet's. Let that one sink in.
What grieving father names his yacht after his daughter's time of death? Why not name his yacht The JonBenet or something similar if it was actually his daughter he was commemorating?
"Ramsey has owned at least three different boats/sailing vessels in his lifetime. Miss America, Grand Seasons, and TenOClock." Source
​
John Ramsey had been a Naval officer, he'd sailed numerous times with Fleet White and owned three of his own boats/sailing vessels. The knot on the garotte was a knot used in sailing.
Jury-Rig has nothing to do with courtrooms or jurors. It is a nautical term used in sailing and ships. When a ship’s mast is destroyed, an emergency makeshift mast must be made for the ship to sail again. This process includes the tying and rigging of rope using various nautical knots that each serve a purpose in supporting the functioning of the makeshift mast. A simple YouTube search on how to jury-rig, will show you the process of jury-rigging a mast on a yacht.
From Wikipedia:
The jury mast knot or masthead knot is traditionally used for jury-rigging a temporary mast on a sailboat or ship after the original one has been lost. The knot is placed at the top of a new mast with the mast projecting through the center of the knot. The loops of the knot are then used as anchor points for makeshift stays and shrouds. Usually small blocks of wood are affixed to, or a groove cut in, the new mast to prevent the knot from sliding downwards.
​
How and why is all of this relevant to the JonBenet Ramsey Case?
We know that cord/rope and knots are part of the murder weapon.
On more than occasion in Ramsey's official police interviews, John had distanced himself from his knowledge and procedural know-how of knots. Why? Why the need to distance himself from his knowledge and procedural know-how of knots?
There were only 2 people in the JonBenet case who had this nautical knot knowledge and who regularly sailed their yachts, even competitively - John Ramsey and Fleet White.
My Take On the Case
One form of destructive behavior (either sexual assault, a satanic ritual or both) led to another and at midnight, someone (adult male) struck JonBenet in the head, cracking her skull. The forceful "blow knocked her into deep unconsciousness" which at first could have led the parents "to believe she was dead." Perhaps assuming that their daughter was dead or irreversibly dying and that they could not save her, they set their minds to work on how they could save themselves. Regardless of this horror, neither was willing to give up their millionaire lifestyle. So John and Patsy began to conceal their crimes by staging the scene to look like a kidnapping gone bad. Strangling JonBenet both gets rid of her, and makes what would have been an accidental death appear to be deliberate. Then they planned to dispose of any damning evidence, but realized that, without evidence pointing to someone else, they would be the only suspects. (The misdirection gave opportunity to more than a dozen false confessors and led to the investigation of 200 potential suspects including an electrician, a homeless sex offender, and a former college professor who had just played Santa Claus for JonBenet.) So, if they were to survive, the resourceful Ramseys would have to rework the crime scene to point to an intruder.
They decided to write a ransom note, which John began dictating to Patsy. As they wrote the note they also made a list, or at least mental notes, of what evidence they must dispose of, and what evidence they could gather and plant to divert attention. Their note had to take into account that: it might take them hours to rework the crime scene; the neighbors may have already noticed the commotion and might watch the house or even call 911; John needed to leave the house to dispose of the roll of duct tape, the spool of cord, the tip of the broken paintbrush, the High-Tec boots, the four practice ransom note pages never found, etc.; neighbors may notice them stirring in the house or might see John driving away or returning way past midnight.
Even though they risked being seen, they were not ready to dump their best alibi. The plan they rapidly concocted called for them to tell the police that they were asleep all night, and heard nothing. Their desperation to avert justice led them to try that alibi. Thus, they planned to "wake up" at 6 a.m. and call the police. However, a neighbor or even an officer in a patrol car might have seen John Ramsey up at 3 a.m. Their wording in the note guarded against that risk. If that worst-case scenario occurred, Patsy could then admit: "Yes, we found the note last night. We were afraid to call the police because of the death threat. John rushed out in desperation to find JonBenet, and I searched the house. Then when John returned without her, we reread the note, I advise you to be well rested, and realized that we had better go to bed to get the rest we needed for the next day. When we woke up, thinking more clearly, we realized that we needed help, so we decided to called 911. But we thought it better not to mention that we had been up desperately looking for her last night."
With that pretext, they went to work. John found a pair of unused shoes, and made a footprint next to the body. He then took those shoes, the oversized underpants, and other damning evidence with him as he left the house around 1:30 a.m. He went out to find a public restroom, at a nightclub, a gas station, a diner, or even at a striptease joint or, preferably, an adult bookstore with video stalls. Somewhere along his journey he dropped the damning evidence in the trash. At the restroom, he used the panties that Patsy had recently purchased to pick up a pubic hair, and then rubbed a stain onto the underpants. Meanwhile Patsy decided to rewrite the ransom note, and she authored the final, personal, contradictory lines, "Don't try to grow a brain John. … Use that good, southern common sense of yours. It's up to you now John!" Patsy then saw the broken parts of the paintbrush that John had overlooked and she hid them among her art supplies. Later, Mr. Ramsey returned to the house, planted the lone pubic hair on the blanket, put the stained underwear on the body, and broke the basement window and disturbed the sill (which he later pointed out to Fleet White).
​
The unidentifiable DNA material on the underwear and under her fingernails was likewise collected by John, but could also have been collected in a day of normal child's play. In his unguarded moment online, police chief Beckner, who had headed up the Ramsey investigation, described the possible sources of that DNA to include "Intentional placement". (If that DNA material had come from an intruder, that would suggest that JonBenet fought and struggled, getting the attention of her neighbors, but not her parents.) To help explain to the police how they could have slept through the attack, Patsy Ramsey had taped their daughter's mouth shut.
Some may think this plan too involved for the Ramseys to pull off. However, John had built a successful defense contracting business, and Patsy had long ago managed to become Miss West Virginia. Further, they had help. Book author and FBI criminal profiler John Douglas wrote Mind Hunter, which reads in part like the JonBenet case in the use of duct tape, ligatures, and similar phrases in its ransom note. Investigators found that hardback in the Ramsey's bedroom.
After rechecking the crime scene, the Ramseys went to bed to rehearse their story. Neither slept that night, neglecting their own advice, as evidenced by Patsy still wearing the same clothes she'd worn to Fleet White's Christmas party.
Traditionally Illuminati parents will both sell and pimp out their own children to the cult for money. I suspect this may have been the case if John himself wasn't sexually abusing JonBenet that night. He may have accepted money from another cult member to sexually molest JonBenet, although that's strictly conjecture on my part that stems from prior experience with these kinds of cases.
​
Nancy Krebs convinced me with her evidence that both John Ramsey and Fleet White had previously sexually molested her - so both of them had a prior track record of sexual molestation of children. Furthermore they both were members of the church we found the Boulder pedophile ring operating out of.
​
Illuminati criminals typically set up a "fall guy" to take the rap for their own crimes and I'm of the opinion this is what John Ramsey was doing to Fleet White - and that it lead to the severing of their relationship. I believe Fleet White became unhinged at JonBenet's funeral in realizing this was what John was attempting to do or may have been attempting to do. Prompting Fleet to write the "open letter to the people of CO" that he later wrote, turning the finger of guilt back at John Ramsey via John's connection to the D.A.'s office and their protection of he and Patsy.
​
However, knowing these cult members have no loyalty to one another in a criminal case like this and how they infight among themselves, I wouldn't rule Fleet White out as a possible suspect. He had a past history of sexual molestation of a minor and he had the nautical knot knowledge to have tied the knot on the garotte used to murder JonBenet.
​
Still, all evidence points to John Ramsey as having been JonBenet's killer, with Patsy as his willing accomplice in covering the whole affair up.
Any parent(s) who had a legitimately kidnapped child would have done everything within their power to aid investigators in finding their child - unlike the Ramsey's who were uncooperative at every turn with the investigating agencies. Even if they didn't trust the Boulder PD, had I been in their shoes I would've hired my own investigators but would have still cooperated with investigating agencies for the sake of my child.
​
Do I think the flashlight was the murder weapon that cracked JonBenet's skull open?
No. One of the neighbors stated he saw strange lights in the Ramsey's kitchen during the time they were staging the kidnapping. Not wanting to alert neighbors to what was going on, I think John and Patsy were using the flashlight in staging the scene, hoping the neighbors wouldn't see anything and believe they were asleep as they falsely claimed. I think the flashlight beam was the weird lights in the kitchen the neighbor reported seeing. That's where that flashlight was kept (kitchen) and where it was found and photographed by CSI. If it had been the murder weapon, John surely would've gotten rid of it with the rest of the incriminating evidence.
​
Do I believe JonBenet's murder will ever be solved? Not likely barring a miracle.
Her case is now 29 years old and cold cases are extremely difficult to solve. Witnesses have forgotten, moved, passed away as has Patsy Ramsey. Evidence or what remains of any evidence given how botched the original investigation was, has likely been deliberately destroyed, lost over time or has simply deteriorated over time. The original crime scene Ramsey house has been remodeled and the wine room concreted over.
There's little left for investigators to work with as far as trying to reconstruct the case.
Furthermore, the Illuminati still hold enough power to thwart any new cold case investigation.
​
On to the paranormal aspects of JonBenet's case...