JonBenet Ramsey Part 2
Case Evidence
I apologize this page is so long but JonBenet's case was a complex one with a large amount of evidence and staging, evidence tampering. etc. taking place as the cover up progressed. So that you understand all that went on in JonBenet's murder I'll go through all of that evidence with you.
The Intruder Theory
Considering the possibility of an intruder, the police allegedly looked for but saw no footprints around the house or outside its windows or in the frost coating of the balcony outside JonBenet's room. Photographic evidence and the early local news reports contradict the later claims that the weather and yard condition were insufficient for an intruder to leave footprints. But then the Illuminati will typically change up their cover story as holes are poked in it. They're usually pretty sloppy when it comes to devising their narratives and cover ups, being so uber arrogant as to think we're all too stupid to figure out what they're up to.
​
There were no signs of forced entry. The alarm system had not been activated.
But I found a release from the Boulder PD that was made in January, 1997 (the year after JonBenet's death)
pretty amusing in their attempting to set up their "intruder" theory they were going to try to sell everyone on.
Here's that release:
The BPD put out the following warning regarding night time burglaries in the Boulder area between "December 12, 1996 and the most recent report was on December 25, 1996": (The exact date of JonBenet's murder!)
​
"January 23, 1997
Boulder Press Release
POLICE ADVISE COMMUNITY OF "MIDNIGHT BURGLAR"
​
Residents Reminded to Lock Doors and Windows at Night Boulder Police are advising residents to be certain they lock their doors following a rash of nighttime burglaries which appear to be related.
The burglaries date back to December 12, 1996 and the most recent report was on December 25, 1996. There is no descriptions of the person(s) responsible but some common information about 14 incidents appear to link the crimes.
​
The concentration of the reports of the burglaries has been in the northwest part of the city but reports have been received from other parts of town.
​
According to Detective Sergeant Doyle Thomas, head of property crime investigations, "The suspect or suspects enter homes through open doors between the hours of 10p.m. and 8a.m., usually while residents are home sleeping.
​
The suspect(s) takes small, easy to transport items such as cash, jewelry, compact disks, and credit cards.
The suspect(s) does not have contact with anyone in the house and essentially sneaks in and out through open doors. Since no one in the house actually sees the burglar, we have no suspect descriptions.
​
The thefts have resulted in thousands of dollars in losses to date. However, police have not discovered the suspect using any of the stolen credit cards.
Added Detective Sgt. Thomas, "We want to remind residents to lock their doors and windows at night and to immediately report to police any suspicious vehicles or persons.
​
Anyone with information is asked to contact Boulder Police Detectives at 441-3330."
I had to laugh knowing precisely what they were up to here. If your report states there's an "intruder" breaking into houses in the period between December 12, 1966 and December 25, 1996 then WHY IN THE HELL WOULD YOU WAIT UNTIL JANUARY OF THE FOLLOWING YEAR TO PUBLISH THAT FACT?!!
​
Answer: Because there never was any "Midnight Intruder" breaking into houses. This is corrupt law enforcement and government agencies involved in the cover up setting up the bogus "intruder" theory for John Q. Public to buy into. When the finger of guilt starts pointing in the cult's direction, they change up their "official narrative" to direct attention away from the perpetrators of the crime. They manipulate your emotions to form your opinions for you is what it amounts to. By 1997 too many were tripping to the fact they had a pedophile ring operating in the area and out of St. John's Episcopal Church of which both the Ramsey's and Fleet White were members of as well as many other indicators that pointed to the real perpetrators being Illuminati and/or Illuminati connected.
These cult whackadoodles are master black magicians and illusionists.
With their right hand they'll create a distraction they want you to focus on, telling you "Look over there!"
At the same time their left hand will be pulling off what they don't want you to see them doing, that advances their agenda. In this case, the "intruder" theory is that distraction to shift and keep your focus off the finger of guilt pointing directly at them and their cover up of JonBenet's murder.
Because they're so uber arrogant and know they operate above the law with impunity, they're typically very sloppy in staging their cover ups and "official narratives" - as they were above with this bogus report.
However, police have not discovered the suspect using any of the stolen credit cards. It does not take over a year to track who's using stolen credit cards. It didn't take that long even back in 1996-97 so they could very easily have identified said "intruder". However, they had to keep this 'intruder' anonymous so you'd buy into them having no idea who broke into the Ramsey's house and killed JonBenet.
Book author and FBI criminal profiler John Douglas wrote the book Mind Hunter, which reads in part like the JonBenet case in the use of duct tape, ligatures, and similar phrases in its ransom note. Investigators found that hardback book in the Ramsey's bedroom.
Then there was this post from Mark Beckner made after his retirement and long after JonBenet's death. Beckner was directing the investigation into JonBenet's death.
​
We know from the evidence she was hit in the head very hard with an unknown object, possibly a flashlight or similar type item. The blow knocked her into deep unconsciousness, which could have led someone to believe she was dead. The strangulation came 45 minutes to two hours after the head strike, based on the swelling on the brain. While the head wound would have eventually killed her, the strangulation actually did kill her. The rest of the scene we believe was staged, including the vaginal trauma, to make it look like a kidnapping/assault gone bad. I have avoided saying who I believe is responsible and let the facts speak for themselves. There are several viable theories.
If the Boulder PD already believed the scene was staged, then why deliberately help the cabal cover the whole thing up and skew the investigation? Why did the Boulder PD make investigative "mistakes" even a rookie cop fresh out of the Academy would know not to make? Elementary things like don't wait until 6 pm that evening to tape off your crime scene in order to preserve the evidence at your crime scene; immediately separate the child's parents to be questioned separately before they can get their stories together; don't let all of Ramsey's friends into the house to contaminate your crime scene; don't send the primary suspect to search the house himself, allowing him the opportunity to tamper with evidence; don't allow the primary suspect to leave the house by himself, having no idea where he's gone or what he's doing! And above all, don't let your primary suspect sit down with the D.A. in her office to informally have a private chat with her!
​
This isn't even Basic Investigation 101! It's just plain common sense to anyone with a single functioning brain cell in their head!
The Basement Window & the Cobweb
So if there was an intruder breaking into houses like they want us to believe, why did the Ramsey's bother to not set that alarm system the night JonBenet was murdered? Could it be they were expecting "company" so left the doors unlocked and the alarm system off?
​
I do believe investigators, even deliberately botching the investigation didn't find any signs of an intruder breaking into the Ramsey house, much less the basement window the cult tried to make everyone buy into.
Could an adult man have gotten through that allegedly broken basement window? Sure, Lou Smit proved that. But I want you to pay attention to the amount of space Lou takes in getting his body through that window, especially past the window sill.
I'll show you why no intruder went through that basement window.
The photo above of that basement window was taken AFTER JonBenet's death and her body being discovered and removed from the home for autopsy.
See that big honkin' intact spider web? No one could have gotten through that basement window without destroying that cobweb. I checked with an etymologist, who said that web was made by a species of spider that was not active during the winter months when JonBenet was killed. That web was made at least the summer previous to her death.
​
And then there's John Ramsey's ambiguity about that window.
​
Here's what he says about it in The Death of Innocence:
Sometime that morning, I remember a day back in the summer when I had left my keys inside and was locked out of the house. To get in, I broke one of the panes in a basement window; then I reached in and released the latch, so I could climb inside. I think about the basement now, I jump up and hurry down there.
That entry place needs to be looked at, I tell myself. I move down the basement hall and find the window. The pane is still broken and the window is open, with a large old Samsonite suitcase sitting right under it. Odd, I think. This doesn't look right. This suitcase is not normally kept here.
Maybe this is how the kidnapper got in and out of our house. (p. 20)
​
Very strange. If he's looking for a point of entry and/or exit and thinks maybe he's found it, why wouldn't he have informed the police about that right away? And why on Earth would he CLOSE the window????
Here's an excerpt from his 1998 police interview:
​
JOHN RAMSEY: I came down the stairs. I went in this room here. This door was kind of blocked. We had a bunch of junk down here and there was a chair that was in front of the door. . . . I moved the chair, went into this room, went back in here. This window was open, maybe that far.
LOU SMIT: Okay. You said -- or how far were you? An inch?
JOHN RAMSEY: An inch, maybe, or less. It was cracked open.
LOU SMIT: Which window?
JOHN RAMSEY: I think it was the little one. There's three windows across here, as I recall. I think it was the middle one. It was that was broken. There was pane [of g]lass broken out of it, which I attributed to breaking myself. . .
JOHN RAMSEY: But it was open and there was a suitcase under it. This hard Samsonite suitcase.
LOU SMIT: Describe how the suitcase was positioned?
JOHN RAMSEY: It was against the wall. I think the handle was on top. It was directly under the window, as I recall. And I closed the window, I don't know why, but I closed it.
LOU SMIT: When you closed it, did you lock it or close it?
JOHN RAMSEY: I latched it. There's a little latch on it.
LOU SMIT: And you're sure of that?
JOHN RAMSEY: Pretty sure, yeah. Yeah, I am sure. I don't think I looked anywhere else. . .
SMIT: Did you tell anybody about that?
JOHN RAMSEY: I don't really remember. I mean, part of what is going on you're in such a state of disbelief this can even happen. And the, you know, the window had been broken out. And you say hah, that's it. But it was a window that I had used to get into the house before.
He accounts for the window being broken by claiming he's the one who broke it months before.
It was cracked and open a little bit. It wasn't terribly unusual for me. Sometimes it would get opened to let cool air in because that basement could get real hot in winter.
Now he accounts for the window being open by claiming he'd kept it open anyhow in the past. Pretty lame! So what if it wasn't that unusual, that's still no reason for secretly closing it! And what about the suitcase, shouldn't he have reported THAT at least?
From the previous year, John's 1997 police interview. ST is Steve Thomas:
ST: OK. When you had previously broken that basement window to gain entry to the home when you had been locked out, can you approximate what month that was?
JR: Well, I think it was last summer. Because Patsy was up at Lake (inaudible) all summer, and it would have been July or August probably, somewhere in that time frame.
ST: Did you remove that grate and get down into the window well?
JR: Uh-huh.
ST: And what did you use to break the pane?
JR: Ah, I don’t remember. Might have been my foot, I don’t know.
ST: OK. You reach in, I’m assuming, unlatched it and gain entry through that small window.
JR: Yeah.
ST: Did you then replace the grate onto that window well?
JR: Oh I probably would have done it that night. I’m sure I didn’t the next morning or, you know, or thereafter.
ST: Did you remove that whole grate off onto the, off the well, to jump down there and get in?
JR: Ah, probably. I don’t remember.
ST: Is there any reason that window went unrepaired?
JR: No. I mean it’s, Patsy usually took care of those things, and I just rarely went to the basement, so it just, I guess, got overlooked. Although she did think that she asked the cleaning lady’s husband to fix it over Thanksgiving when they were doing some repair work there, but I don’t know if that’s ever been confirmed whether he fixed it or not.
I don't know about the rest of you, but if I forgot my keys and had to break a window in my house to get in, I'd sure as hell remember how I did it and whether or not it was fixed. Especially if I was security conscious enough to have an alarm system! I'm going to make sure that window was repaired. Even if my partner took care of things like that, I would've asked "Did you get that broken window repaired?"
There's another problem with this broken window fairy tale. When John Ramsey and Fleet White made a beeline to the basement to "discover" JonBenet's body and reported they'd found a broken window in the storage room next to Burke's train room, Fleet White told investigators he'd found only a couple of little shards of glass beneath that window! If an intruder had broken in through that window, the broken glass from the entirety of the window would've been found beneath it - not just a couple of little shards of glass Fleet White described to investigators. I've never heard of a legitimate intruder busting a window to access a house and stopping to sweep up the glass from the window he just broke! Intruders aren't generally into stopping to houseclean, you know? They get in, they take what they want, they get out as quickly as possible. I believe in intruder jargon it's called "Not getting caught".
​
Then there was the report to investigators the Melody Stanton's husband he'd seen strange lights in the kitchen around midnight and heard what he described as "metal banging against concrete". Well, if you're going to stage your crime to look like an intruder kidnapped your kid and gained entry to the house from that broken basement window, you're going to have to open the metal grate covering the window well to get access to that window to break it.
Here's a photo of detective Lou Smit opening the metal grate that covered the window well to that broken window. As you can see, there's a concrete surface that grate would rest against once it had been opened.
​
I think Melody Stanton's husband had it absolutely correct. He heard someone opening that grate to stage the scene and this would be at least 2 hours after JonBenet's time of death since he heard that clanging of the metal grate being opened at midnight as he stated.
​
There was also another neighbor that reported to
investigators that he saw a dark figure creeping through the Ransey's yard, headed in the direction of that window. Again, this was around midnight at least 2 hours after JonBenet had been killed. Since his timeline account jives with Melody Stanton's husband's midnight account, I think he saw whoever was staging the scene going through the Ramsey's yard to open that grate Melody Stanton's husband heard clang against concrete.
The Kitchen Flashlight
Melody Stanton's husband alos reported he saw strange light coming from the kitchen.
This was the flashlight CSI found sitting on the Ramsey's kitchen counter.
​
A person who's being truthful doesn't change their story, they have no need to. John and Patsy changed their stories regarding this flashlight.
First they told investigators they didn't own a flashlight like that. Then Patsy later said well yes they did own a flashlight like that but it wasn't in the place in the kitchen where it was normally kept.
And it's interesting that detective Mark Beckner in his post reporting this flashlight as possibly being the weapon used to inflict the massive blunt force trauma to JonBenet's skull that would have killed her eventually had she not been strangled to death first.
Blunt force trauma to JonBenet's skull
I have a cop flashlight that looks exactly like the one photographed on the Ramsey's kitchen counter. It's called a Stinger. It's heavy for a flashlight but not so heavy that it could cause the massive blunt force trauma found on JonBenet's skull without someone with the strength of Hercules hitting JonBenet in the head with it. I'm not discounting that could be what was used, but it just seems highly unlikely to me.
​
Furthermore, at some point during the night either John or Patsy left the house to dispose of evidence. I believe it was John Ramsey while Patsy was working on the ransom note. Certainly if the flashlight had caused JonBenet's head trauma, John would've gotten rid of it with the rest of the evidence he was disposing of that was of far less significance than a potential murder weapon.
The Suitcase
This is what pushes the intruder theory into the realm of the patently absurd for me. It's why amateurs shouldn't attempt to stage crime scenes.
Hardsided Samsonite suitcase John Ramsey eventually reported he found
propped against the basement broken window
Notice first of all that the window John Ramsey had reported broken is now boarded up. According to John, this is what the intruder must've climbed on to reach the window in order to gain entry to and exit from the Ramsey house.
This suitcase had been packed with some things special to JonBenet, indicating the 'intruder' was planning on leaving the house with her. So we're supposed to believe an 'unknown intruder' knew what things to pack that were special to JonBenet?
We're also supposed to believe an adult male weighing what an adult male might typically weigh, carry the dead weight of 45 pound JonBenet, climbed up on that suitcase without it tipping over to climb out that window with dead JonBenet in his arms?
​
Now let me show you another photo taken of the same suitcase from further away.
You've got both a chair and a footstool sitting right near the door of that room. But instead of grabbing the chair or the footstool, you elect to use a suitcase that's going to tip over and allegedly risk waking the allegedly sleeping John and Patsy Ramsey so they catch you in the act of kidnapping their daughter.
Apparently that 'unknown intruder' had the IQ of a jellybean.
​
First of all, an 'unknown intruder' isn't likely to know what JonBenet's favorite blanket and toy was to pack them nor where to find said items. And if you're a legitimate kidnapper you aren't going to waste time and risk getting caught packing a suitcase for her, especially if you're threatening to kill the kid anyway as stated in the ransom note. Packing a suitcase is something a parent would do.
​
Then there's the layout of the basement.
If you're kidnapping a child, when are you going to put something in place to climb out that window with the kid? When you're ready to leave with her, right? Especially if you're in a panic because something's gone wrong with your plan and the kid ends up dead as all indications are what happened in the Ramsey house that night. So you want to get the hell out of that house pronto.
​
That broken window is in the storage room next to Burke's train room as John Ramsey himself stated to Lou Smit.
​
Why then would you drag or carry the 45 pound weight of that dead child all the way across that labyrinth of basement rooms to the
wine cellar to dump her body there? If you're in a panic to get out of the house, you're going to leave JonBenet in the storage room you're attempting to escape with her from.
​
The close friends of the Ramseys who knew that house gave investigators the answer to that. Anyone who wasn't familiar with the basement wouldn't have known that wine cellar was there. If you're John Ramsey and you want to be the one to find JonBenet, knowing investigators are certainly going to search the house, you're going to stash her in a room you know they likely won't search - which they didn't. The wine cellar.
And even if they did attempt to search it, you know they won't find the light switch unless they knew where that oddly placed light switch was. There are no windows in the wine cellar so they'd be looking into pitch darkness without knowing where that light switch was.
​
John Ramsey himself reported going down into the basement early on the morning of Dec. 26th and observing that the window to the train room was cracked open. Then why wait MONTHS to report this to investigators and tamper with that evidence by closing that window as he stated he'd done?
​
And I'm sorry, but if I'm down in the basement looking for my supposedly kidnapped child, I'm going to look in every single room in that basement while I'm down there. Yet John doesn't enter that wine cellar until nearly that evening to 'discover' JonBenet's dead body. John told Lou Smit that he rarely went in the basement at all. Well, if not searching the basement for JonBenet, what exactly was John Ramsey doing down there to begin with? Staging the scene to look like a kidnapping before the cops arrived.
Patsy's 911 Call
Patsy Ramsey called 911 at 5:52 a.m. on Dec. 26 telling police that her daughter was missing and that she had found a ransom note.
911 dispatchers can catch bullets with their teeth. You aren't going to put one over on them, they can recognize a rehearsed 911 call in a nanosecond. They develop radar for those kind of calls. I had three of my dispatcher friends listen to that call. All three agreed it sounded like a staged call that had been rehearsed.
​
Boulder's 911 operator Kim Archuletta says, "I just remember having that sunken feeling... The problem was, if you hear the frantic in her voice when she's speaking to me, where she couldn't even answer my questions, it immediately stopped... it sounded like she said 'Okay, we've called the police, now what?' And that disturbed me... To me, it seemed rehearsed…"
​
Patsy had thought she'd hung up the phone after she made that 911 call. She hadn't and that 911 operator was able to hear 2 additional voices talking in the background.
But first let's decode Patsy's 911 call:
There have been many theories about what Patsy said after she thought she'd hung up the phone including:
911 operator Kim Archuletta: "Okay, we've called the police, now what?"
Many feel she said "Help me, Jesus. Help me" followed by "What did you do?"
Then a male voice (John Ramsey?) saying "We're not talking to you"
Followed by a third indiscernable voice, likely male.
​
But speculation isn't evidence or proof. The following video was made by a gentleman who not only does audio and acoustics for a living but also teaches it. He has done an analysis and restoration of Patsy's 911 call in an attempt to catch what Patsy said after she thought she'd hung up the phone. He shows every step he took in doing this.
Best listened to with headphones.
There have been many theories about what Patsy said after she thought she'd hung up the phone including:
911 operator Kim Archuletta: "Okay, we've called the police, now what?"
Many feel she said "Help me, Jesus. Help me" followed by "What did you do?"
Then a male voice (John Ramsey?) saying "We're not talking to you"
Followed by a third indiscernable voice, likely male.
​
If I'm to remain objective, I have to agree with this expert. That portion of the 911 call simply can't be enhanced enough to determine precisely what Patsy (or anyone else) said after Patsy thought she'd hung up the phone. We can't discern for certain that the 3rd voice was that of a child, Burke as many believe. Speculation isn't evidence. The most we can conclude is that Patsy wasn't alone ("WE have a kidnapping") and four 911 operators have concluded the call was rehearsed before it was made.
​
The terminology she uses in that call fit with what one would normally hear in a kidnapping call. It's obvious she's distanced herself from her daughter, never once using JonBenet's name in that call. When someone fakes a 911 call they'll get overly polite - as Patsy did with her numerous "Please! Please!" She says she doesn't know what the ransom note said. The ransom note instructed not to alert the police or anyone else or JonBenet would die. Yet the first thing she does is call 911.
The Ransom Note
Police experts analyzed handwriting samples from 73 persons in and around the case and only one person could not be ruled out. On March 5, 1997, John Ramsey and Burke were cleared as writers. The investigators believe Patsy wrote the note and on April 14, 1997, they request from her a fifth handwriting sample. An expert used by the FBI assessed for the Boulder PD that after the crime, only one person of those investigated made a conscious effort to change their handwriting. Compared to her previous writings, after she had received a copy of the ransom note, Patsy changed her handwriting habits including for example her distinctive way of writing the lowercase 'a'.
In addition to her special sign-off and indentation similarities found by detectives, an ABC 20/20 program presented some of over 200 similarities found, including surprising idiosyncrasies, between Patsy's handwriting, with those in the ransom note.
​
​With Cina Wong, the same handwriting expert interviewed by 20/20, Investigation Discovery produced this 2-minute ransom note analysis:
Regarding the ransom note, no fingerprints were found on it even though it was "read" by the Ramseys and moved by them, yet multiple fingerprints from Patsy were found on the pad the pages were taken from. Patsy said only that she didn't recall if she ever touched the note, ran upstairs with it, etc.
Two minutes of Patsy refusing to acknowledge recognizing her own handwriting on the photos of herself and JonBenet in her own family's photo album.
Boulder PD contacted Dale Yeager and Denise Knoke at Seraph, Inc in 1997. Seraph Inc is a security consulting firm with investigative professionals and former intelligence officers. They were asked to submit an analysis of the ransom note.
Their conclusion: “…you are investigating a child’s murder with ritualistic overtones. Strangulation and sexual assault are most commonly seen in sadomasochism between heterosexual and homosexual adults.”
Bingo. There you have a description of the sexual deviancy and love/practice of torture that define the Illuminati in a nutshell.
Ritualistic Overtones
There actually is a sacrificial ritual which is meant to be performed on Christmas Eve. It's called, "The Last Bulb of the Christmas Tree." It was created by Josef Mengele, a German SS officer and physician who performed deadly human experiments at Auschwitz concentration camp during World War II.
"JonBet" is an Illuminati term for Devil, making JonBenét the "perfect victim" for this particular sacrificial ritual. No, those aren't "conspiracy theories".
The name Jonbet means "Jonbet, pronounced 'Jon-bay', is a name for the devil, or one of his so-called deifications. Source
Different occult cults have different rituals but these are some of the standard ones practiced by hard core Satanists like the Illuminati:
All of us working together agreed JonBenet was that Last Bulb of the Christmas Tree, which is why she was murdered when she was. She was the perfect Illuminati sacrifice: Blonde haired, blue eyed, very pretty, 6 years old (occult numerology, 666) and most importantly, a virgin.
In our opinion, this is what the rituals and sexual abuse JonBenet reported was leading up to, her being their intended Christmas Eve blood sacrifice all along.
​
It was just as the handwriting experts had concluded from Patsy's ransom note:
Their conclusion: “…you are investigating a child’s murder with ritualistic overtones.
​
This is supported by several things:
-
Bill McReynolds (who played Santa for the Ramseys) "had written a card to JonBenet that was found in her trash can after the murder. Then there is the statement from the mother of a friend of JonBenét’s. The woman said that on Christmas Eve day in 1996, JonBenét said Santa had told her he was going to make a secret visit to her after Christmas. Another mother also stated to BPD investigators that JonBenét had told a playmate about a Secret Santa.
McReynolds was the brother-in-law of the Boulder Police Chief at the time.
-
The Illuminati are obsessed with their occult symbolism, believing it gives them more demonic power. Part of the Last Bulb of the Christmas tree ritual is tying a symbolic cord around the wrist of the ritual sacrifice such as the one found on JonBenet's wrist that investigators noted was not tied tightly enough to restrain her. It wasn't meant to restrain her. It was part of the ritual.
Pamela Griffin
Randy Simon
On Dec. 27, 1996 Patsy Ramsey, being exhausted and lying down, reached up and touched the face of a friend, Pam Griffin, the woman who had made JonBenet's pageant costumes.
Griffin thought Patsy was delirious when she asked, "Couldn't you fix this for me?" as though a sewing machine could bring back her daughter.
She then remembers Patsy saying, "We didn't mean for this to happen" and Griffin got the definite feeling that in her weakened condition, Patsy had revealed that she knew who the killer was.
("WE" is plural not singular, indicating more than one was involved as I said.)
​
​Inevitably what we find with the Illuminati is it's like a spider web. These pedophiles all have connections to one another.
​
Please don't misread this...Pamela Griffin had no idea what Randy Simon really was when she introduced him to Patsy Ramsey.
Simon was a photographer Griffin recommended to Patsy to take pageant photos of JonBenet, which he did. He'd also taken photos of Pam's own daughter, who was JonBenet's pageant coach. It was in going through these photos of her daughter that she realized the cording on a kite he'd used as a prop photographing her daughter was the very same ritual cording found on JonBenet's wrist.
​
​Pam reported this fact to the Boulder PD. Twenty nine years later they still
haven't contacted Pam about her report to them about this cording. Highly suspicious given McReynolds criminal record!
Simon was arrested in October 1998 in Genoa, Colorado, for walking nude down Main Street. He was also arrested on 15 counts of downloading child pornography.
​
Pamela revealed she has been warning police for two decades that Simons, who told her he did not have an alibi for the night of JonBenét's murder, should be treated as their top suspect in the girl's death.
-
Illuminati cult parents routinely pimp their children out for money as sexual objects/favors to other family members, friends and other members of the cult. JonBenet indicated to me this had been done by her father to his friend and at least one other man she didn't know, while "Daddy watched them" the night they killed her. The same holds true for their rituals.
-
Illuminati parents will kill their own children without as much as a second thought to protect both themselves and their cult.
The Hi Tec Bootprint
An unidentified HiTec bootprint was found in the cement dust next to JonBenet's body. The Boulder PD found no evidence of either John or Burke Ramsey owning a pair of HiTec boots. I should mention here this is a brand of boot typically worn by cops.
The Boulder PD claims they checked the boots of every cop employed by them and none of the boots of their officers matched the tread pattern of the HiTec boot that was left beside JonBenet's body.
This doesn't discount the possibility John Ramsey got rid of them with the other evidence he disposed of - including any of the rest of the distinct white ritual cording found on JonBenet's wrist.
JonBenet's Underwear
The Ramsey's made no secret of JonBenet's bedwetting problem but it was armchair detectives that spread the nonsense JonBenet wet her bed that night and Patsy killed her because she flew into a rage that JonBenet had wet the bed again. They also wrongly placed the puddle of urine that was found in the wine room. Incorrect, the puddle of urine was found at the door to the Hobby Room/Burke's train room.
Yellow circle above indicates where the urine puddle was found
Below are the crime scene photos of both the panties and the long johns JonBenet was found dressed in that night.
The Garrote Knot
As you can see, JonBenet's bladder was very full, The pattern of urine staining indicates JonBenet was in the face down prone position when she wet herself in the train room doorway, given the staining appears on the front of the underwear. Judging from the amount of swelling in her brain, the ME estimated the blunt force trauma to her skull would've rendered her unconscious to the point someone could easily have thought he was dead and that JonBenet received that cracked skull up to 2 hours before she was strangled.
Given the amount of brain swelling the ME found which would have put JonBenet deeply into unconsciousness, in that instance she would've had no control over her muscles so the bladder would've released on its own, naturally.
​
Remember, no one but someone who knew the layout of the basement would've known that wine room was even there. There's no way to prove it conclusively now but this indicates she was not killed in the wine room if we're to believe the 'lone intruder' staged scene. JonBenet would most likely have had her skull fractured and and been strangled in the train room or thereabouts, then carried to the wine cellar in order to hide her body to ensure John Ramsey was the one who 'discovered' his daughter's body.
​
In addition to this, Patsy lied to investigators saying she didn't recognize JonBenet's panties and had no idea where they came from. Except that the circle of Patsy's friends knew the story of those underwear and investigators found both the rest of the package of underwear and the sales receipt for them from Bloomingdale's in New York in the Ramsey home. Patsy had bought the underwear for her niece, who was older and larger than JonBenet. But when JonBenet saw them she liked them and asked Patsy to let her have them instead. Since they were too large for JonBenet, Patsy put them on a top shelf in JonBenet's closet, where investigators found the rest of the package containing the other 6 pair.
​
If Patsy did recognize the distinctive underwear, and was lying, then she was trying to point the police to the exculpatory evidence, which she knew had been planted.
​
Why would Patsy need to lie about the too large underwear JonBenet was wearing when she was killed?
An 'intruder' if he needed to put underwear on JonBenet would naturally have gone to the underwear drawer in her dresser. He would not have known about the too large underwear on JonBenet's top closet shelf.
​
Here's the crime scene photo of JonBenet's bed taken after her death.
As you can see from the absence of any urine staining, JonBenet had not wet the bed that night.
​
When confronted with the fact investigators knew Patsy had lied about the too large underwear, Patsy then changed her story to she had dressed JonBenet in those panties before putting JonBenet to bed for the night and put the long johns over them because she was afraid JonBenet might get cold during the night.
What remains a mystery is why Patsy would dress her daughter in panties she knew were too large for her, then lie about it.
​
And since JonBenet hadn't wet her bed, why would an 'unknown intruder' have had any need to put underwear on JonBenet at all, especially given the fact he intended to rape her so would have to take her underwear off to do that?
​
Incidentally, a composite of 3 males' DNA was found on JonBenet's underwear, all 3 allegedly unidentifiable. It's been 29 years since JonBenet was killed and tremendous advances have been made in DNA testing. I'd love to know if the Boulder PD submitted the underwear for more advanced DNA testing available now and if they haven't, why not?
The Garrote Knot
As far as I'm concerned this is one of the most important pieces of evidence that existed in JonBenet's case.
John Ramsey had been a Naval officer, he'd sailed numerous times with Fleet White and owned three of his own boats/sailing vessels. The knot on the garotte was a knot used in sailing.
John Ramsey specialized in Jury-Rigging at Michigan State.
​
Jury-Rig has nothing to do with courtrooms or jurors. It is a nautical term used in sailing and ships. When a ship’s mast is destroyed, an emergency makeshift mast in order to sail the ship again.
This process includes the tying and rigging of rope using various nautical knots that each serve a purpose in supporting the functioning of the makeshift mast. A simple YouTube search on how to jury-rig, will show you the process of jury-rigging a mast on a yacht.
From Wikipedia:
The jury mast knot or masthead knot is traditionally used for jury-rigging a temporary mast on a sailboat or ship after the original one has been lost. The knot is placed at the top of a new mast with the mast projecting through the center of the knot. The loops of the knot are then used as anchor points for makeshift stays and shrouds. Usually small blocks of wood are affixed to, or a groove cut in, the new mast to prevent the knot from sliding downwards.
​
How and why is all of this relevant to the JonBenet Ramsey Case?
We know that cord/rope and knots are part of the garotte murder weapon.
On more than one occasion in Ramsey's official police interviews, John had distanced himself from his knowledge and procedural know-how of knots. Why? Why the need to distance himself from his knowledge and procedural know-how of knots?
There were only 2 suspects in the JonBenet case who had this nautical knot knowledge and who regularly sailed their yachts, even competitively - John Ramsey and Fleet White.
That helps narrow your list of suspects down considerably.
​
Now let's combine John Ramsey's knot tying knowledge he tried to hide from investigators with the following:
Memorializing A Kill
The Illuminati memorialize their successful kills. For example, the monument they built to themselves in Dealy Plaza after they assassinated JFK, the monument where the Twin Towers stood before the 911 attack are just two examples of this.
​
John Ramsey did this with the new yacht he bought after JonBenet's death, naming it after his daughter's official time of death - the TenOClock. What parent in their right mind would name their yacht after their daughter's hour of death? If he wanted to honor or remember his daughter, why not name the yacht something like the JonBenet?
​
"Ramsey has owned at least three different boats/sailing vessels in his lifetime. Miss America, Grand Seasons, and TenOClock." Source
​
Combine the memorializing the kill Illuminati habit with the fact only John Ramsey and Fleet White would've known how to tie that particular nautical knot found on the garrote along with John Ramsey distancing himself from his knowledge of knots with investigators and you have a real eyebrow raiser. Not to mention finger of guilt pointing at them. There would be no other reason John Ramsey would need to distance himself from his extensive knowledge of nautical knots as he did with investigators unless he'd tied the knot on the garrote and strangled JonBenet and knew that garrote knot would point to him as the killer.
The Bowl of Pineapple
Investigators found a bowl of pineapple on the counter in the Ramsey's kitchen. A whole lot of people put great emphasis on this bowl of pineapple...I don't think it tells us much of anything except that JonBenet's fingerprints were found on neither the bowl or the spoon, only Patsy's fingerprints are found on them.
The pineapple was sitting in milk and only someone very close to JonBenet was likely to know JonBenet had the unusual habit of eating her pineapple in milk.
The bowl of pineapple
According to Patsy there was no pineapple served at the White's Christmas party that night. But that's really kind of neither here nor there. JonBenet's autopsy report stated the ME found what MAY have represented fragments of pineapple but couldn't determine it actually was pineapple.
​
For many years pathologists have argued about the reliability of the analysis of the state of digestion of stomach contents as an indicator of the time between the last meal and death. The time of consumption, if known, along with volume and type of meal, could be used to estimate the post-mortem interval (time since death), but this possibility is usually dismissed due to the great variation of the digestive process even in normal circumstances.
​
Examination of stomach contents in an autopsy are primarily used to determine time of death, a secondary purpose being to check for drugs, poisons or toxins in the body. In JonBenet's case, the severity of her skull fracture and the amount of swelling that had occurred in her brain would also help determine time of death and likely more accurately than JonBenet's stomach contents would. Her time of death was established to be around 2 a.m. on December 26th based on the amount of swelling found in her brain. Not so much what MAY have been pineapple but couldn't positively be identified as being pineapple.
And as staged as the crime scene was, the bowl of pineapple may just have been a part of that staging and nothing more, given only Patsy's fingerprints were found on the bowl and spoon.
The Blanket Covering JonBenet's Body
Blanket used to cover JonBenet's body
Statistically speaking the majority of homicides are committed by family members, which is why investigators first rule those closest to the victim in or out as potential suspects. Often in familial homicides, the family member will cover the victim's body so as not to have to look at the victim - as JonBenet was found, wrapped in a blanket. Suggesting her homicide was a familial one.
That blanket held a pubic hair not linked to any family member. Unidentifiable DNA material, not from a single intruder, but a "composite from multiple people", was on her underwear and beneath her fingernails.
DNA under a murder victim's fingernails means JonBenet was at one point trying to fight off her attackers and that there had to be more than one person attacking her since a composite of DNA from multiple people was underneath her fingernails. JonBenet may have gotten that DNA under her nails long before she was killed. If used as a satanic sacrifice, she would have been physically tortured prior to being sacrificed so could have gotten the DNA multiple composite while trying to fight off her SRA abusers.
So this multiple DNA composite shows more than one person who was not of JonBenet's family was involved in what was done to her.
​
From the autopsy, the coroner Dr. John Meyer found evidence of sexual assault from the previous night: a small abrasion and small amounts of her own blood in both her underwear and vagina. Three medical experts consulting for the police say that the injuries were also consistent with prior sexual abuse. As the Denver Post reported, the Dec. 27 autopsy "found scraping and swelling of the child's vaginal area, as well as a series of scrapes on the back of her right shoulder, left lower back and left lower leg. Sheila Rappaport, a Denver prosecutor who tries individuals accused of sexually assaulting or killing small children, said "such a pattern is indicative" of such assault.
JonBenet Tased
The Illuminati attach symbolism to virtually everything they do. It's no different with tasing a person. Where they tase someone has symbology behind it.
​
JonBenet was found with two marks on her face that were determined to have been made by taser prongs.
JonBenet was being subjected to a ritual and her taser marks on her body
and their location have symbolic/ritualistic significance. She had a second set of stun gun marks on her back. Additionally, we investigators found that in those homicide victims we managed to recover, almost without exception they died of some form of throat trauma as JonBenet did. You can see neck cording marks at right in the photo above.
The Odd Behavior Of the Ramseys
Literally, within only a few hours of finding their daughter's dead body, the Ramseys began assembling their team of many lawyers and private investigators. John hired separate attorneys for himself and Patsy. They paid for lawyers for a number of other family members, and very early even hired a high-powered public relations expert. In the early days of the case the Boulder police unwisely treated the Ramseys like nothing other than victims. Yet apparently it never occurred to John or to his very capable private investigators, who were hard at work by the day after the murder, to share anything, not even "a shred of their findings", with the police who were at work allegedly searching for whoever did this to JonBenet.
​
Even more bizarre was the Ramsey's behavior the day JonBenet was killed. Parents of a missing child usually cling to one another for support. Patsy spent most of the day in the sunroom with her female friends. John Ramsey read his mail and went to his office. At 1:30 p.m. a detective overheard John Ramsey talking by phone to his pilot and arranging a trip to Atlanta that evening for himself, his wife and son. Det. Sgt. Larry Mason told him, "You can't leave."
What father arranges to continue the family's planned Christmas celebration while his daughter is supposedly kidnapped and still missing???!!! Or did John already know JonBenet was dead?
When detective Linda Arndt directed John to take a friend and search the house but don't touch anything, John grabbed his best friend Fleet White and immediately made a beeline for the basement and the wine cellar - where he 'discovered' JonBenet's dead body.
​
Fleet White ran upstairs shouting for an ambulance, Priscilla White and Barbara Fernie left their friend on a couch and hurried toward the commotion but Patsy stayed where she was.
​
Arndt saw Mr. Ramsey carrying the body from the basement, JonBenet's unsupported arms extended above her head, and realized that rigor mortis had set in, and that she had been dead for some time. Rigor mortis sets in within 2 to 6 hours after death, peaking (as JonBenet's rigor had) around 12 hours after death.
Additionally, JonBenet's body had the scent of decomposition about it.
Arndt quotes John Ramsey as telling her just then, "It has to be an inside job."
​What would make John think it was an inside job and tell Arndt that when he had spent all night staging the scene to look like an 'unknown intruder' had kidnapped JonBenet?
​
Despite Arndt telling John Ramsey not to touch anything while searching the house, Ramsey did exactly that when 'discovering' JonBenet's body, contaminating the most crucial evidence investigators had - the body itself. He unwrapped his daughter's body from the blanket it had been wrapped in, tore the duct tape off her mouth, and most importantly, removed her body from the wine cellar contaminating that entire crime scene. He then carried her upstairs, laid her in front of the Christmas tree, then covered her with a second blanket, contaminating any evidence on her body even further. This tells me he's not a father who wants his daughter's killer found!
​
When he carried JonBenet's body upstairs, his eyes met detective Linda Arndt's. She stated in her interview that she knew she was looking into the eyes of JonBenet's killer and was afraid for her own life being she was outnumbered 7 to 1. Having been in law enforcement, we develop 'radar' when dealing with criminals and in reading them, as I'm certain Arndt did in that moment. There would be no other reason for Arndt to mentally be counting the bullets in her gun at that moment, as she stated she was.
Then there was Fleet White's so uncharacteristically going off the rails at JonBenet's funeral and the severing of the years long best friends relationship between John Ramsey and Fleet - which neither of them has ever explained the cause of.
​
Cabal members routinely turn on each other in a heartbeat in the interests of protecting themselves.
​
Fleet White was the one who encouraged John to do the CNN interview in the first place.
And why not? The Illuminati owns and controls ALL of the U.S. major news media outlets on down.Knowing this, if you want to portray yourself as being innocent, what are you going to utilize to do that? Those same Illuminati-owned and controlled media outlets as the Ramseys constantly did rather than work with investigators.
​
It was when Fleet White discovered John intended to have Patsy do that interview with him that Fleet flipped out and lost it - to the point a member of the Ramsey family got his gun and hid it under the sofa cushion, believing Fleet was so flipped out he might actually kill someone. Why was Fleet so adamant Patsy not appear in that CNN interview when the interview was his idea to begin with? Patsy was very drugged up in the days following JonBenet's death. Was Fleet afraid she'd reveal what really happened that night, to the point he so uncharacteristically went completely off the rails? I personally suspect that was the case. Regardless of whether that was the case or not, John and Fleet's years long relationship as best friends ended there. They haven't spoken to one another since.
​
Even among their circle of closest friends they divided into two camps. Anyone who wasn't supporting John and Patsy's innocence was shut out as being any friend of the Ramseys by the Ramseys themselves.
​
What typically happens in Illuminati cases is that when the finger of guilt begins to point in the direction of the guilty party, the guilty party will play both sides of the fence simultaneously acting as the good guy championing the quest for justice for the deceased victim - as both John Ramsey and Fleet White did since JonBenet's funeral and continue to do even 29 years later. Particularly John Ramsey.
This is aided by high up government officials, such as Boulder D.A. Mary Lacy exonerating the Ramseys involvement in JonBenet's death publicly and in writing, even apologizing to them for ever having been considered suspects to begin with. Mind you, Lacy had bought into the hoax "unknown intruder" theory hook, line and sinker and was promoting it. The police investigation wasn't even close to being wrapped up when she so unjustifiably exonerated the Ramseys as innocent despite all evidence to the contrary and knowing full well the Grand Jury had delivered an indictment of the Ramseys!
My Conclusion
This had all the earmarks of being an Illuminati homicide whether JonBenet's death was supposed to happen as a ritual sacrifice or something went horribly wrong that resulted in her death as JonBenet told me.
​
In these cases, there's very seldom one person responsible being a cult is involved and birds of a feather flock together as the saying goes. I believe this was certainly the case with JonBenet's death.
I believe the Ramseys at the very least pimped JonBenet out to some of John's friends to be sexually abused by them. We know from the 3 unknown males present DNA results that John and Patsy weren't alone in the house that night. My personal opinion is that most likely Fleet White, Bill McReynolds and the 3rd friend of John's JonBenet revealed to me were there as were most likely others who left the scene when things went to hell in a handbasket. The Illuminati don't typically hold a ritual with only 3 men present.
​
I don't think Patsy killed JonBenet or had any hand in her death but she most certainly (as any Illuminati wife would) did everything in her power to help stage the scene to look like a kidnapping. I don't think Patsy was even in the basement when JonBenet was killed and only discovered her daughter was dead after the fact.
​
That a huge cover up ensued was painfully obvious.
​
Who actually strangled JonBenet to death? In my opinion, John Ramsey did. He had the nautical knowledge to tie that garrote knot and tried to hide his nautical knowledge of knots from investigators on more than one occasion. That speaks volumes to me as does his so typical Illuminati cult member behavior.
​
But when I work such cases, I have to objectively follow the chain of evidence which is why I devised the checklist I did for working these cases. That checklist has to contain a fair number of evidential checkmarks before I'll conclude "OK, this looks like it's Illuminati related."
This case had a whole lot of Illuminati indicators in it and tips the scale toward Illuminati involvement.
​
Do I think JonBenet's case will ever be solved? No. If it hasn't been by now, 29 years later it's not about to be.